Monthly Archives: December 2011

Redistricting could make re-elections tougher for two Central New York politicians

Despite campaign promises of a more independent and less political redistricting process, Democratic leaders from the Assembly and Republicans from the Senate are poised to soon release maps designed to ensure each political party will retain its power in each legislative chamber.

“We haven’t done the maps yet,” said Assemblyman John J. McEneny, an Albany lawmaker who is the Democrats’ point man on the task. But McEneny and others involved are beginning to meet with state lawmakers from their parties to update them.

Assemblyman Bill Magnarelli, D-Syracuse, said he was expecting an update on the 120th District in coming days.
Valesky and Miller are less likely to get that kind of sneak peak before the state’s Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research — a group of lawmakers and appointees closely watched by Albany leadership — releases the maps to the public. Sen. Michael Nozzolio, R-Fayette, is also on the task force.

Read the entire article

State Threatens to Pull Millions for Schools in the City and Elsewhere

New York State’s education commissioner threatened on Tuesday to withhold tens of millions of dollars in federal grants to struggling schools in New York City and nine other districts statewide if they do not prove by Saturday that they will carry out new evaluation systems for teachers and principals.

Officials and union leaders in each district must first agree on the details of the evaluation systems, like how much weight students’ standardized test scores will have on the annual ratings that teachers and principals receive. Compromise has thus far proved elusive.

Of the 10 districts, which are the only recipients of the federal grants in New York, only Rochester and Syracuse as of Tuesday had submitted proposals for the state’s review, the commissioner, John B. King Jr., said in a statement. “When the ball drops at midnight on New Year’s Eve,” he said, “the money drops off the table, and it will be difficult to get it back.”

Read the entire article

Reed disappointed in payroll tax cut vote

The congressional and presidential approval of the payroll tax cut didn’t leave everyone smiling before Christmas. Just ask Congressman Tom Reed about it, and you’ll hear at least one voice of frustration.

Reed lamented the deal in a conference call Monday, terming it a “clear case where politics won and policy lost.”

Approved Friday, the cut will keep the current 4.2 percent for Social Security payroll taxes paid by approximately 160 million workers through Feb. 29. The rate was scheduled to rise to 6.2 percent with the new year.

The deal also renewed federal benefits averaging $300 a week for the long-term unemployed through Feb. 29, and prevented a 27-percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors and extended other health care fees through Feb. 29.

Read the entire article

N.Y. mandate panel touts $245M in savings

A panel charged with reducing unfunded state mandates on local governments is recommending steps to save $245 million, but its final report did not tackle some of what are considered New York’s most onerous and costly mandates.

The Mandate Relief Redesign Team’s recently released report didn’t propose changes to the Wicks Law, which requires multiple contractors for public projects. It has long been criticized for increasing the cost of construction.

Nor did it recommend a full state takeover of Medicaid, a health care program for the poor. Unlike most states, New York requires counties to pick up a portion of the total cost, and local officials have asked for the state to assume full responsibility. The Medicaid Redesign Team, another panel that recently finished its work, proposed a state takeover.

The Mandate Relief Redesign Team had until the end of the fiscal year, March 31, to hand it its final report, but it was submitted to Gov. Andrew Cuomo late last week. It was published on the governor’s website without any public announcement. Some members said the submission of the report took them by surprise.

Read the entire article

Political Crystal Ball: Cuomo/Schneiderman/Duffy Edition

As part of our year-end analysis of what’s happened at the state Capitol in 2011, Gannett’s Albany Bureau spoke with three statewide officials who have had busy years: Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, and Lt. Gov. Robert Duffy.

And while it’s been just one year since each of them took office, all three have been the subject of speculation regarding their political future, with Cuomo often mentioned as a potential Democratic candidate for president in 2016 (or later).

We asked each to gaze into the crystal ball. Here’s what they said.

Cuomo, on the persistent chatter that he may be eying the White House in 2016:

“I’ve heard a lot of talk for a lot of years on a lot of levels,” Cuomo said. “I focus on doing my job for the people. I focus on what I need to do today and what I need to do tomorrow and everything else is a distraction.”

Duffy, on Cuomo’s aspirations and the possibility of taking over the governor’s office:

“I have never once heard the governor mention anything about what his aspirations are other than being the best governor in the history of the state,” Duffy said.

As for being governor, Duffy said, “My goal is not to aspire his position.”

Schneiderman, on whether he may run for governor some day:

“I might, but I would emphasize that that is at some point in the future,” he said. “Right now, I love doing the work of attorney general. I love being back practicing law. I love doing public policy and public-interest work, and frankly right now I can’t imagine a better job for me.”

“Something else may happen down the road,” he continued. “But right now I’m very happy and completely focused on doing this work and intend to do it as long as the people of New York state will allow me to do so.”

Source

Congressman Tom Price on Repealing Obamcare and Reforming Our Healthcare System

City, village officials bracing for tax cap

As if it wasn’t already hard enough to put together a budget.

Hearing for months about the new tax cap, local municipal and school officials are now saddled with the extra concern of trying to keep as many services as possible while keeping their levy increases to around 2 percent.

Judging from the comments of many officials, that promises to be a mountainous task. Health insurance and pension payments are soaring, and a paucity of mandate relief from the state has left local officials paying the tab for those costs.

The cap has produced a steady stream of complaints from local officials. They are critical of the mind-bendingly confusing formula as well as how a fiscally-challenged state such as New York could have the nerve to address local spending limits.

At a workshop held Tuesday in Alfred, officials from the New York Conference of Mayors said the cap is estimated to be 2 percent for the cities and villages compiling budgets in the upcoming months. Each year, the cap will be either 2 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower.

Read the entire article

Reed earns his moment in spotlight

A year and seven weeks after winning election to the House and a year and five weeks after nearly dying from a blood clot, Rep. Tom Reed of Corning found himself standing Thursday in a place where few freshman lawmakers ever stand: just behind the House speaker’s right shoulder.

The speaker, Ohio Republican John S. Boehner, had chosen Reed as one of eight House negotiators on the then-stalemated bill to extend a payroll tax cut. And suddenly Reed, not long removed from being a small-town mayor, found himself defending the House GOP’s opposition to a two-month tax cut extension before a national audience on C-SPAN.

Only time will tell whether that’s a good or a bad thing.

Just hours after the press conference where Reed dismissed the Senate’s two-month bill as a “politically convenient” way of getting Congress and the president home for the holidays, Boehner agreed to that very same bill.

And Tom Reed’s moment in the spotlight became something to explain.

“My initial reaction is that the speaker did what had to be done, even though it was a demonstration of politics winning out over policy,” Reed said on Friday.

Astonishing as the House Republican flip-flop was, Reed’s presence in Boehner’s office through much of that fateful day might be even more astonishing.

Read the entire article

Pork Lawsuit Motion for Reargument (Please Forward and Post!)

[Note: this motion is to be submitted for decision on January 23, 2012.]

Court of Appeals of the State of New York

LEE BORDELEAU, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,

-against-

The STATE OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants—Appellants.

Brief of Appellants for Reargument

December 21, 2011

QUESTION PRESENTED

1. Should the Court grant reargument because it overlooked or misapprehended the legal points outlined herein.

Proposed answer: Yes.

Read the entire argument

Permanent Link on NTPP

Senate argues for August primary

Senate Republicans have filed a letter with Judge Gary Sharpe, who could rule as early as next week on a federal Department of Justice challenge to the current September primary date.

They argue for August 12, as they have done consistently. Assembly Democrats are pushing for a date in late June; the Department of Justice drafted an order for Sharpe asking for a date before August 18 in order to comply with a federal law requiring military voters get their general election ballots at least 45 days before the voting day. New York’s current primary in September makes that essentially impossible.

During a hearing earlier this month, Sharpe indicated he would defer to the current legislative intent as much as possible — meaning, he would pick a date as close as possible to September. David Lewis, the Senate’s attorney, pushes this point in the letter:

It is respectfully submitted that the proper exercise of the power of this Court is to set a date nearest in time to the previous determination of the state legislature. Principles of comity and deference to the state’s power command that the Court follow as closely as possible the intention of the legislature in enacting the election law—the primary should be held close in time to the general election as has been the law of the state for the past thirty-seven years. The arguments for a June primary and claims of its viability are contrary to the legislative determination which has stood for this extended period.

Lewis also argued that moving the primary to June would have a harsh impact on redistricting.

A look at the timeline for redistricting in the last cycle demonstrates that August is a more necessary date,” he continues, before hashing out the timeline. “Once the redistricting was complete, the Boards of Elections then were still required to reconfigure the districts using the Census information and establish the lines of the individual election districts. Elections Districts are the building blocks for the creation and identification of districts. Given the positions of the Commissioners as to how onerous the voting process already is, their silence on the issue of what their post-reapportionment responsibilities and burdens will be under a June primary, is inexplicable. In reality, the Boards will need as much time as possible to conform to the new lines, establish the boundaries and make maps, voting books and the like. To assume that they can get it all done by June beggars belief. The 2002 experience is the best guide. In 2002, the primaries were held in September.

Here’s the letter:

GOP Primary Letter

Source